|
|
Links Are All About Reputation An Interview with Mike Grehan
By Scottie Claiborne
Linking is a hot topic these days -- anyone with a Website and an
interest in search engine traffic knows that you have to get some good
incoming links in order to be found in the search engines. However,
most people are a little lost when it comes to landing them.
I recently caught up with SEO guru Mike Grehan at the SES conference
in San Jose, where he gave an informative session on link building. I
met with Mike later in the week to discuss his thoughts on links,
business, and PageRank.
SC: What do you think is the biggest misunderstanding among
webmasters/SEOs when it comes to link building?
MG: People look at links as if they are all the same, and often they
go for quantity over quality. That's not the way to do it.
Link analysis has its roots in citation analysis and social network
analysis concepts. A couple of sharp scientists named Pinski and Narin
found that by using these predictive methods it could be possible to
determine the next winner of the Nobel prize. The guy who had the most
papers citing his work was the guy most likely to get the nod.
However, even in the world of science, an early type of spam reared
its ugly head. Pinski & Narin were aware that this type of analysis
could be skewed or distorted by using methods of manipulation, even to
the point of simply bribing someone to mention you in their paper. To
combat this, they recognized that the work of some authors/researchers
carried more weight than others, i.e., had more influence. Influence
weight made it harder to manipulate results, as the community
reputation of the author plays a large part in the calculation.
SC: How does this relate to link building?
MG: Just as in the scientific community, the influence weight plays an
important role on the Web. The search engines are trying to determine
the most relevant results for their search queries, and to do this,
they analyze the linking structure of the community.
They "know" what specific pages are about and they assume that pages
that link together are somehow related. They are essentially sharing
their reputation with each other. The more pages that point to a
specific page, the more importance or influence that page has in their
calculations.
Think about it like this: I make blue widgets. I sell them to Rolls
Royce. I tell my customers, our blue widgets are the best -- we sell
to Rolls Royce. At Rolls Royce, they tell their customers their cars
are the best because they only use our blue widgets. Both businesses
are using the reputation of the other one to enhance their selling
proposition.
That's what links can do. A sound linking proposition enhances the
reputations of both businesses.
SC: How does a business go about obtaining these quality links?
MG: It's only hard to get links if you don't know why you need them.
Writing to a Webmaster with a form mail that says "I've added your
link, will you add mine" is crap. If someone wanted to partner with
your business and sent you a template e-mail, would you take them
seriously?
You've got to give that other business a reason to link to you. It's a
business proposition, not a link exchange. Both sides must benefit
from the partnership. If you don't know what your site has to offer
another site or why your link is valuable, it's time for early
retirement!
The best way to earn those links is through quality content. When a
site links to you, they are staking their reputation on you. That's
something to think about when you consider linking to a free-for-all
site or a link farm.
SC: What do you think about buying links?
MG: If you can buy a quality link that relates to your site, buy it!
It's a business proposition like everything else. That's certainly
one way to do it and a relatively easy one, if you have the
opportunity.
SC: Are themes, or links only from related sites, important?
MG: It's not about themes; it's about communities and reputation.
Linking creates virtual communities.
Links from the business community you exist in are going to have more
influence than unrelated links. I say this because the search engines
are going to make some simple assumptions -- a link from page A to
page B is a recommendation by the author of page A. If page A and page
B are linked, they might be somehow related.
A network of links in from pages in the community that are truly
related is going to build a stronger reputation for that page than a
bunch of unrelated links.
SC: Some people try to increase their link popularity by setting up
multiple domains to link to their main site. Does this help?
MG: Absolutely not. Those mini-networks are like spam islands if they
don't have quality links pointing into the satellites as well as the
mother ship. They are easily detected.
SC: What do you think about selecting sites as link partners based on
their Google PageRank?
MG: I've done a lot of research on this. I know exactly what PR7
means: It means you have one more than six but one less than eight.
That's all it means. Stop obsessing about PR; get on with business!
----
Scottie Claiborne
RightClickWebs
Contact WingsDove for affordable and effective small business web design and
web site optimization.
|
|
|
|
|